Sunday, April 3, 2005
Salon H & I (Hilton Cincinnati Netherland Plaza)
Session: 1199, Pain, 1:00 PM

Psychometric Testing of a New Pain Assessment Behavior Scale (PABS)

Margaret Campbell, RN, PhDc, FAAN, Nurse Practitioner, Nursing Department, Detroit Receiving Hospital, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, Elizabeth Renaud, RN, MSN, CS, Nurse Practitioner, Anesthesia, Detroit Receiving Hospital, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, and Linda Vanni, RN, MSN, CS, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Nursing Department, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, Detroit, MI 48201.

Psychometric testing of a new Pain Assessment Behavior Scale (PABS)

 

Purpose:  To establish the internal consistency and construct validity of a new instrument to measure the presence and intensity of pain for patients who cannot self-report.

Conceptual framework: Nociceptive responses activated by pain produce measurable behaviors.  Some patients with pain are unable to use self-report instruments due to illness severity or cognitive impairment.  An observation scale that measures pain is postulated to have clinical and research utility.

Subjects:  A convenience sample of 316 adult men and women patients were recruited from three hospitals and a cancer institute in one urban medical center. All subjects provided a self-report about pain.  Patients with drug or alcohol abuse histories, or chronic non-malignant pain were excluded.

Method: Subjects were assessed at rest.  The patient’s pain behaviors were rated using the PABS. Subsequently, the patient was asked to give a numeric score to current pain with “0” representing no pain and “10” the worst pain.  Other variables collected included age, gender, race, pain type, and primary diagnosis.

Results:   Eleven patients were excluded post hoc leaving a sample of 305 subjects for analysis. The subjects were women (56%), African-American (70%) and Caucasian (29%) who were experiencing visceral (31%), bone/muscle (32%), incisional (29%), or neuropathic (8%) pain.  Subjects had medical diagnoses (53%), surgery or trauma (30%), or cancer (17%). The patient’s report correlated with the observed behaviors (r=.694, p=.000).  The reported pain score (mean=4.2 ± 3.5) was significantly higher than the PABS score (mean=2.16 ± 2.8) (t=13.08, p=.000). Internal consistency of this five variable scale is strong (alpha=.88).

Conclusions:  The instrument is reliable and performed well within and between diagnoses with both men and women.  A difference in pain scores may result from inflated self-reports or masked behaviors. Further testing is needed with subjects who cannot self-report.

Session #1199 - Pain

The 29th Annual MNRS Research Conference (April 1-4, 2005)